Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chartered Institute of Administration
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 21:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chartered Institute of Administration[edit]
- Chartered Institute of Administration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a non-notable organization. Searching for independent third party reliable sources all that I turn up in searches that actually hit on the name are a series of passing mentions as found in some of the actual hits in this example search: [1]. The mentions tend to be when describing an individual's career history and mention the Chartered Institute of Administration, but do not focus on the organization itself at all, and notability is not inherited. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I also do not find any in-depth coverage, but there are a fair number of references to alumni as noted by the nominator. Cumulatively they seem enough to justify keeping a stub on the subject. ThisDay mentioned it here Aymatth2 (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.