Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charnock Hospital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. For the record, there is a discussion on WT:CSD whether a hospital, church etc. is an organization and thus eligible for A7, although it doesn't matter for the outcome here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charnock Hospital[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hospital. The references given at the talk page contain only trivial mentions. Adam9007 (talk) 23:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete hospitals are corporations and the speedy should have been allowed to stand instead of being deleted by the nom here. whilie it is good the nom at least followed through with this afd, this is a waste of time. Jytdog (talk) 01:17, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, they appear to be classed under both organisations and buildings, so who knows? Adam9007 (talk) 01:33, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no assertion of notability in the article, doesn't meet relevant guidelines. FuriouslySerene (talk) 19:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The A7 was valid: a hospital is an organization. (they are located in a building, but the hospital retains its identity no matter how many buildingsit may move to, just as a commercial business does, however it may change its location. Inany case, there is no indicate of notability or even significance. DGG ( talk ) 04:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.