Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charly Maíz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charly Maíz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual whose scope as a PR manager evidently extends to using WP for self-promotion... –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only superficially survives A7 (assertions of notability). Number of Twitter followers, WP:PUFFERY, poor sources. Ultimately just fails WP:NPEOPLE. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Rhododendrites put it better than I could have. CtP (t • c) 22:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've been trying to give new articles a bit of time to grow before I bring them to AfD. I don't think there's any chance that reliable sources will be found for this person. I tried to tone down the promotional content in this article, but I see that some of it has already returned. I believe this article is being used solely for promotion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete The article seems to be entirely publicist or self written.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the only talent seems to be spamming. Bearian (talk) 21:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.