Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlo Greene (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. To open an AfD about an hour after haggling over a redirect must be considered as disruptive as specified in WP:SK # 2b. Please continue discussion, if necessary, on the pertaining talk page. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 19:29, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Charlo Greene

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Charlo Greene
• Articles for deletion/Charlo Greene (2nd nomination)

Charlo Greene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The consensus in the first AfD seems to have been a weak keep due to "Too Soon". Looking at her biography, the only notable thing she did was to quit her job on the air while throwing an expletive. Everything done since (working on a marijuana legalization campaign, having campaign finance dispute with a regulatory agency, and being evicted) are not notable to merit this article. My personal preference is to close as a redirect to KTVA#News operation, just in case she'll become more notable in the future, but we'll see how this discussion goes. Victor Victoria (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

• Speedy keep, speedy close. The nominator does not favor deletion, but is acting out of spite because her unilateral redirect of the article has been contested. There are several appropriate fora for discussing redirection of an article, but wasting the community's time with a retaliatory AFD isn't one of them. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
  • If you can suggest a more appropriate forum, I will be glad to take it there. Victor Victoria (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.