Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Potter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Potter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the GNG or WP:NACTOR. Only has one acting role and has done nothing else of note. Basically a WP:BLP1E. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 15:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 15:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A good example of why BLPs should not be created on children except in exceptional circumstances. There are plenty of children who have had leading parts in cinema and on the stage, but that does not define their life or career. Anything to be said about Mr Potter's part in the film can be said in that article, nothing else justifies a biographical article. --AJHingston (talk) 15:34, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per WP:BIO1E. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Obviously NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.