Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Morrow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 08:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Morrow[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Frankly I don't think this subject is notable and it is worth pointing out that the chief contributor, though not creator, is a user named Charliemorrow. Reichsfürst (talk) 11:49, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:AUTOBIO. Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 14:25, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this page should be deleted. The only semi-reliable source on Charlie Morrow that I could find was a website created by him himself, http://www.cmorrow.com/. The article itself looks as if it were copy and pasted. In other words its not put together very well. It could use improvement and more reliable sources.--Sarah.Maretich (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(July 5, 2011) Charles Morrow is an extremely important figure in avant-garde music of the latter 20th century, both for his own compositions as well as his activities in the field, e.g. the New Wilderness Foundation, EAR Magazine (one of the pioneering publications devoted to experimental music). In fact there is in entry for him in The Grove Dictionary of American Music, an extremely significant and authoritative reference source. The new 3 CD set just issued by Phill Niblock's XI label (Experimental Intermedia) should do a great deal toward rectifying Morrow's seeming neglect in recent years. This article certainly should not be deleted. Hopefully I can find some time later this month to make it conform to Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.10.249 (talk) 21:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of notable third-party mentions. I didn't find any good sources on both Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 06:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.