Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Laine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 14:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Laine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesnt appear to npass pornbio or gng. The only proper source is a local news interview so counts as a primary source which doees not count to notability. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails both guidelines Rainbow unicorn (talk) 02:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - well known, 12x interwiki, several nominations to awards, Penthouse Pet, appeared on The Howard Stern Show. Notable. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 17:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO with only scene-related award nominations. Fails GNG without significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Citations in the article are low quality or passing mentions. Independent searches yield only passing mentions. As for Subtropical-man's keep rationale, we've been through all this before. Penthouse Pets are not inherently notable. Appearing on Howard Stern doesn't establish notability. And inclusion elsewhere on Wikipedia is laughable. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As stunning as she is unfortunately looks don't count towards notability, per the above Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets - While I haven't done a large amount of research on the subject under consideration here, the best option at this time appears to be a redirect. Guy1890 (talk) 06:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/redirect per Gene93k's accurate analysis and as the established standard outcome. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 22:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.