Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charli Carpenter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cool Hand Luke 10:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charli Carpenter[edit]

Accomplished professor, but wouldn't seem to meet our inclusion guidelines WP:PROF or WP:BIO. No articles about her, just a few casual mentions here and there.[1] W.marsh 01:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom and unsourced. Cirt (talk) 03:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The article establishes no notability for what appears to be a regular university lecturer. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promising young academic, but nothing notable at this point. --Crusio (talk) 11:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Assistant (i.e., non-tenured) professor at a major university, recent ph.d., do not in themselves suggest notability. The field is notable but I can't tell whether Carpenter's work has yet achieved notability. --Lquilter (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as author. She has two books, and 13 peer-reviewed papers, and a large NSF grant. A $600,000 NSF grant to an asssistant professor is a recognition of notability. I filled in the article, which left out a good deal. DGG (talk) 22:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per Crusio and Lquilter. The level of accomplishment mentioned by DGG is good, a sign of a successful academic career, but not to my mind quite enough yet for our standards of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, assistant prof, the papers are average output. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 01:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At this point, I simply do not feel that anything in this article meets the standards of WP:PROF. I do not feel that a grant counts as an award or honor, I'm afraid. SorryGuy Talk 08:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.