Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Winters (journalist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Winters (journalist)[edit]

Charles Winters (journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG: This is an amazingly promotional article. The references include defunct gossip blogs, his own websites and (presumably) social media accounts, and even a letter to the editor of the student paper at his university. I looked for additional sources and didn't find anything useful.
I wouldn't expect that his nightlife personality award nominations and win count towards ANYBIO, since the awards are not well-known or significant (and I know the HX one is allegedly rigged/given to whoever buys more advertising in their magazine). I couldn't find him on IMDb, and I don't think that the roles described in this article make him a notable actor. Cheers, gnu57 23:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu57 23:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. gnu57 23:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu57 23:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. gnu57 23:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. You beat me to this. I was planning on nominating this myself. A BEFORE yielded nothing besides (mostly defunct) gossip blogs and social media. Completely not notable. --Kbabej (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete When your listed "accomplishments" include reporting on 9/11 and being the first to cover Anna Nicole Smith's death...yeah, no. Article is one big pat on the back and awards are non-notable. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 17:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a huge failure of having reliable and notable sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per nomination. Article is simply WP:PROMOTIONAL. ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 05:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per all above. Not notable. Crossroads -talk- 21:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.