Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Prast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. bd2412 T 11:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Prast[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not qualify for Wikipedia. It is more a resume or advertisement for him and what he does. This type of article should never be allowed in Wikipedia. Navycrafted (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fluff erected on passing mentions. Nothing of depth. Hyperbolick (talk) 22:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per WP:RESUME KidAd (talk) 23:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject is mentioned in a few articles, but I'm not seeing WP:SIGCOV in the least bit. Anything discussing his career in any depth is either a directory or a press release, neither of which are good for WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Gargleafg (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT, WP:NOTRESUME, WP:SPAM, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:MILL. This is a horrible mess, not an encyclopedia article. If if it could be fixed from the current c.v./spam, the subject is actually sort of run of the mill in finance. Bearian (talk) 22:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Per above the subject does not satisfy WP:SIGCOV, Alex-h (talk) 16:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.