Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Ecker (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 03:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Ecker[edit]

Charles Ecker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

American county-level politician who fails WP:NPOL and has no other claim to notability. Previous AfD four years ago closed as no consensus and featured numerous flawed arguments. AusLondonder (talk) 02:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Maryland. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Link to the previous AfD, which was under a different article title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles I. Ecker -Ljleppan (talk) 08:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NPOL and still in my mind fails WP:GNG due to the very local element of the coverage. SportingFlyer T·C 15:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete As someone from the area, he was someone who was CE when things just went along without notable events. Pretty much just a name on a list. Mangoe (talk) 15:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral: Parsing through newspapers.com, there are quite a lot of mentions of Ecker (around 6,000); now of course most appear to be passing mentions, but there are a few that do provide WP:SIGCOV ([1] [2]; in addition to [3] [4]) that get this article just over the nominal threshold for WP:GNG, with smaller mentions (like [5] [6] [7]) able to fill in the gaps of content. However, all of the sources seem to be WP:LOCAL, and I'm not sure they are necessarily strong enough to assuage that concern. Curbon7 (talk) 16:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Funny little tidbit: there is an entire article dedicated solely to his muscle car [8]. Curbon7 (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Regional/local politician fails WP:NPOL. KidAdSPEAK 17:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.