Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles E. H. Lucy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Cleared as filed. 13:23, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Charles E. H. Lucy[edit]

Vanity article created by subject Justinc 00:31, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note that it was split out of great great grandfather (Charles Lucy) which just about is ok as a stub, but orginally created by an anon IP who clearly really is User:Lucytune whos talk page User talk:Lucytune is basically a copy of the article. Clear vanity, not notable, writing about himself. Justinc 00:34, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This has been userfied. This just about gets over the line for mine. The information about working with James Sanger who has produced work by Dido and Keane. Two albums of Lucytuned Lullabies which are versions of third world lullabies see [1] and are available commercially. Keep. Capitalistroadster 01:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "Userfied"? Justinc 01:49, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Put on the user page Descendall 12:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The information is already on his talk page isn't it. Capitalistroadster 02:06, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What difference does that make? Can someone just verify if this falls within WP:MUSIC guidelines and whether the information is externally verifiable. The article is clearly created by the person in question so there is probable bias. Justinc 02:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Vanity. NN. Ifnord 04:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn. mikka (t) 06:37, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sorry. My lazy recearch. He is also referred to as simply "Charles Lucy", and he was even mentioned, e.g., by BBC, hence verifiably notable. mikka (t) 07:07, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. NSLE _{(讨论+extra)} 09:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity. Dottore So 10:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, borderline passes WP:Bio, the two CDs appear to pass WP:Music, there also seem to be a few thousand downloads of songs from the CDs on some of the music download sites. Also, person is mentioned as the main proponent of Lucy tuning, which seems significant enough. HGB 18:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any non-duplicated content back into Lucy tuning and redirect. MCB 02:23, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.