Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charity Treks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charity Treks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. My speedy deletion tag was denied with the edit summary "Declining G11; long-standing article, not wholly promotional. Notability not clearly demonstrated". The article being long-standing isn't relevant and I disagree about it not being wholly promotional. SL93 (talk) 01:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.