Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charge Carrier Extraction by Linearly Increasing Voltage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Charge Carrier Extraction by Linearly Increasing Voltage[edit]
- Charge Carrier Extraction by Linearly Increasing Voltage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This was proded with the rationale that it returned few Google hits, which is not surprising since it is a highly specialized scientific term. There is a fair bit of coverage on GScholar [1] which means at minimum it isn't just a concept one person came up with. Not being knowledgeable in the subject, I can't tell if it is sufficiently notable for an entry or not so I am sending it here with no opinion personally. ThaddeusB (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 01:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 01:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete far too specific a sub-term, and described in the article as 'novel'. If someone creates a Charge Carrier Extraction article, this material could go there. JJL (talk) 01:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, probable original research. JIP | Talk 05:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.