Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chappa'Hai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted by User:Jimfbleak. Non-admin closure. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 07:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chappa'Hai[edit]

Delete, fan fiction/hoax. Based on Marvel Comics characters and publications, but not actually featured in any. Postdlf (talk) 04:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as hoax, possible attack page. --Dragonfiend (talk) 04:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is fan fiction Wikipedia isn't a webhost for your fan fiction. Whispe ring 04:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy per CSD G1 - Surprised this obvious nonsense/hoax even got prodded. Absolutely no assertion of notability or any ties to the publisher. MrZaius^talk 04:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This article does not meet the criteria for either patent nonsense or gibberish. Hoaxes are explicitly not included in CSD G1 criteria. It's difficult to see how a vandalism or attack page CSD is a good fit for the fanfic nature of the content. Further, the rationale for the courtesy blanking is unclear since no real person is attacked or defamed in the article. That said, the standard WP:MADEUP or WP:SPECULATION deletion arguments seem to apply in the absence of verifiable references for the character. -- Michael Devore (talk) 05:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could be wrong, but when I see an article on an apparently non-notable real living young woman whose name is given in the article and who is described as having a fat belly, becoming lovers with a duck, and then going insane, among other things, then I suspect it's possibly an attack page. Somebody just delete this already. It would probably be speedier if I nominated myself for adminship and then did it myself. --Dragonfiend (talk) 06:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No real name is given in the article that I have seen. A quick check of the name you may think is real, Molly Hayes, shows her to be a Marvel character, as is Howard the Duck (who as I remember from days long ago, did have a human lover). If you could provide more substantial justification for the blanking, I would be happy to agree with your action. -- Michael Devore (talk) 06:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I believe you think Chapa'Hai is a real person's name. Well, perhaps. I don't think it fits with the rest of the content or the tone of the article, but you may be right. It's a small matter, since without reliable sources the article should be deleted soon enough. -- Michael Devore (talk) 06:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, one last time going through the article looking for the attack. Too many possible names, but I think you meant the Limberly alter ego of Chappa'Hai. It does look like a not-so-clever switching of first initials of a real person, and the Kansas mention doesn't help. With that in mind, the blanking is certainly justified, along with a possible attack speedy. -- Michael Devore (talk) 06:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.