Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanidapa Pongsilpipat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. But with the little participation, no prejudice to speedy renomination. Davewild (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chanidapa Pongsilpipat[edit]

Chanidapa Pongsilpipat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress with questionable notability-all of the pages seem to be fan pages for her. Wgolf (talk) 18:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Currently, I am expanding the content of the article. References will be added in the process. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:42, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I'm not going to be of much use here because I'm not a Thai speaker but the article has somewhat improved now with the sources added by the user above and my English sources found nothing and she has no IMDb page so it's possible much of it is going to be Thai. Although I have to say, she's hasn't had that many movies over the years so I'm not sure how much attention she has gotten in Thailand. SwisterTwister talk 01:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.