Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chang Jui-chuan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chang Jui-chuan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real assertion of notability in this article. The Chinese Wikipedia article does provide some more information, but even reading the material there, I still don't see where the notability is. Unless notability shown during the discussion, delete. --Nlu (talk) 05:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not get there on WP:Prof; can't comment on hip-hop. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I quote from the review, "best Taiwanese hip-hop album of the year. But considering the size of the field, I’m not sure how hard it would be to win such an honor." So much for any eminence in the music field (I did not exhaustively go through WP:MUSICBIO as I think common sense should prevail here). As for WP:PROF, no notability whatever. Ray^Talk 20:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.