Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandran Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:34, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chandran Media[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company fails WP:CORP, as there are no independant sources that discuss it. Angryapathy (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. I did find this press release reprint, but that's all. -- Whpq (talk) 14:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or speedy delete. Had I come across it, I would have put a {{db-spam}} tag on it. This is a promotional piece placed by this SPA who I suspect is a publicist for the outfit. this, its tone and the otherwise unverifiable information, would indicate possible copyright violation - although I cannot find the full article. Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggest an eye be cast over related articles Explocity and Ramjee Chandran. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.