Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandramukhi 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chandramukhi 2[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Needless to say, its too early for this film to have an article. No official confirmation about anything, as stated in the article itself. EelamStyleZ (talk) 22:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Violates WP:CRYSTAL. Derild 49 21 ☼ 01:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Too soon.--Sodabottle (talk) 02:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also suggest a redirect/merge to Chandramukhi since there is a short section about the sequel. EelamStyleZ (talk) 04:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON and set a redirect to Chandramukhi#Sequel where this proposed film is covered far better than in the current and premature stub. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Chandramukhi#Sequel as there is not enough information for a standalone article, but it is a valid search term. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 11:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CRYSTAL. --WorLD8115 (TalK) 13:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A redirect of this likely search term to the parent article, where this topic is already treated in a more thorough manner, achieves your deletion and sends readers to the one place that makes sense. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.