Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanapatana International Design Institute (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chanapatana International Design Institute[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see substantial coverage despite surviving the last AfD. the in citation is a dead link. and only one third party sources is given. this is just a small private institute with little indepth coverage as shown in a gnews search which include Thai language media. LibStar (talk) 06:16, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not sure about the dead link, but The Nation has also covered the institute in 2007 and 2009. Covered in-depth by the Asian Wall Street Journal in 2003 (reproduced in the author's website, as given in the article). Also in-depth coverage by national Thai newspapers Post Today and Kom Chad Luek. Article on the Thai Wikipedia mentions several features in Thai Rath, although they aren't available online for free. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:GNG per [1], [2], [3]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:19, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.