Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Championship Wrestling League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Championship Wrestling League[edit]

Not notable backyard wrestling promotion. Nenog 06:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Backyard wrestling promotions are almost never considered notable. This one does not assert any notability, an attempt to Google search is hampered by it's very common name (but none of the searches I could see were relevent). Lrrr IV 07:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete backyard feds as a rule do not belong on Wikipedia, this one hasn't achieved anytning that would even make me consider it's inclusion MPJ-DK 08:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Backyard federations are not only non-notable, they make a mockery of everything professional wrestling is. Hellswasteland 14:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. As per CSD:A7.--Edtropolis 18:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nominator. Backyard wrestling isn't notable - G 1 ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 22:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, per nom. Nikki311 04:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.