Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chambersburg Cardinals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Ron Ritzman (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chambersburg Cardinals[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability standards (WP:N, WP:GNG, only reference is the team website, fails COI/NPV, potentail ADV). Previously deleted via WP:PROD, brought back via WP:REFUND for an apparent procedural review.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. —Paul McDonald (talk) 04:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and attempt to save by finding some sources; Google News archives return over 100 hits, so there should be at least some to back up the information here. If sufficient sources cannot be found, redirect to Seaboard Football League. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not ready to withdrawl, but it is looking better!--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's a work in progress. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 11:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination Withdrawn article and sourcing has improved dramatically, nice job. Still needs some cleanup on sources cited, but it is down to simple editing and deletion should no longer be considered.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.