Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chak 128 NB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 04:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chak 128 NB[edit]

Notability issues this place is not notable enough to be added in Wikipedia BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 06:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It has long been accepted that villages are considered notable. In Pakistani Punjab villages are known by numbers rather than names - see Chak (village) - but that in no way diminishes their notability. This confirms that the village exists. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if it has long been accepted that villages are notable, please provide a link that demonstrates this. Unless that happens, I think we should delete this as non-notable. SkipSmith (talk) 05:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OUTCOMES#Places Phil Bridger (talk) 14:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my vote to neutral - although I disagree with the policy, it looks like there is some kind of consensus that any kind of village is notable, regardless of size or fame.SkipSmith (talk) 22:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Real villages are inherently notable. Edward321 (talk) 00:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Real place where actual people live Lets drinkTea 01:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability isn't an issue as already discussed, but this google search shows the article contents are utterly non-verifiable. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The question of notability is moot; as demonstrated, villages are inherently notable. The question is of verifiability. A small village like this isn't going to get many internet hits, but the link provided by Phil Bridger is enough for me. --Ged UK (talk) 11:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Long standing consensus states that populated places are inherently notable, as stated at WP:OUTCOMES and WP:DEFACTO. Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.