Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chah-e Allahdad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chah-e Allahdad[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mass-created Iran geostub by User:Carlossuarez46. Name is of a well, but there is something at the provided coordinates that could be a village. I removed unsourced content about an alleged murder that contained dubious information (The prime suspect behind the bodies is Wanye Al-ballshar[...] [who] uncovered the bodies; the population has declined by 2 million") and was accompanied by an image generated by This Person Does Not Exist. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Is this a legally recognised, populated place? No. It's name declares it to be a well, the source states it is an abadi (which is a class of locations that need not be populated and includes mere locations such as wells, pumps, petrol stations, farms, bridges, etc.). Therefore fails WP:GEOLAND#1, and also WP:GNG. We cannot do WP:OR based on satellite photos that could just as easily be showing a farm or something else, and even if it is a village, is it known by the name used in the article? Very likely not. Including GEONames Net Server as an additional source does not solve this problem as that also is an unreliable source. FOARP (talk) 09:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: even if this is a village, it's almost impossible to verify whether or not it goes by this name. —VersaceSpace 🌃 14:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.