Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chadwick Hagan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 03:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chadwick Hagan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suggesting deletion as this appears to be an autobiography which lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. Subject is an author, so while there are articles to be found written by this person, I was unable to find such articles written about this person. As always, please contact me on my talk page if sources are located to the contrary. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete no evidence of notability, independent or otherwise. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep evidence of notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by Econ48 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC) — Econ48 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 11:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and draft and userfy to userspace if needed as my searches found no better coverage. SwisterTwister talk 22:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.