Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Rycroft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Rycroft[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Another of the many hundreds of NN articles created by Dolovis in open and knowing defiance of consensus concerning applicable notability guidelines, and for which he received a community ban from new article creation. Fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject -- in this case, a player with an ephemeral career in the semi-pro low minors -- meets the WP:GNG. Ravenswing 15:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are way too many articles on non-notable hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:Ravenswing. That article's creator's talk is something to behold. City Of Silver 03:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately. Just someone whose definition of consensus and guidelines was "Whatever I want them to mean." An amazingly tendentious fellow. Ravenswing 03:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Rlendog (talk) 21:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:NHOCKEY.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.