Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Conners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Conners[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly an in detail. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO as the 1995 Grabby Awards category ("Best Newcomer") is not significant and well known. Significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable pornographic actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Consensus is that the Grabby Awards do not meet the well-known and significant industry award standard for WP:PORNBIO, and so the performer fails that guideline. Fails WP:BASIC without significant coverage by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable porn actor, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 00:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Grabby Awards were given by a local Chicago magazine, and relentlessly spammed yearsw ago by a now-banned COI promotional editor. As Gene93k accurately notes, they do not establish notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.