Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chłodnik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 08:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chłodnik[edit]

None notable kind of soup. Stub article can't be expanded any further. Prob doesn't taste good either--M8v2 21:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Comment. M8v2 created this AfD but didn't add it to the daily log. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete. If this belongs anywhere, it's Wikibooks, but the info is so bare bones, I don't think it would be useful there. Mangojuice^talk 04:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A single sentence belongs in Wikibooks? Surely you jest. Zetawoof^(ζ) 04:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A quick Google search suggests that chłodnik is a Polish soup dish similar to borscht. Zetawoof^(ζ) 04:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. It would be nice if this article was more than one sentence though. wikipediatrix 05:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per Wikipediatrix and Zetawoof. A quick google search suggests that it is a notable soup. Should be expanded. --Stuart D. 08:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Actually, it is different from barszcz, as it is cold and the beet may be replaced by fruit. Zhurek or żurek is of course even more notable and has no article yet. --Pan Gerwazy 11:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Poor stub, but notable as many kind of dishes; I would caution the nominator to consider his comments in the future so they are not as offensive.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 18:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have rewritten it completely and it is now a worthy stub. To M8v2: it is notable - just maybe not well known outside Eastern Europe. And it tastes great! To Zetawoof: it is quite unlike plain borscht - believe me. ;-) Misza13 17:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure it does - I'm just comparing it to another "ethnic" soup with a somewhat better article. Zetawoof^(ζ) 17:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Is the soup related to the cold borscht? // Liftarn 15:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per wikipediatrix and improve the article. Yamaguchi先生 23:39, 29 September 2006
Keep - being a stub doesn't mean it can't go anywhere. Dylan 03:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.