Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Century Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Withdrawn per Dravecky's overhaul. Good work. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Century Mall[edit]

~~Non-notable mall. No reliable sources found. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)~~ Withdrawn per Dravecky's overhaul. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A page on the same mall was previously deleted under a different title, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Century Consumer Mall. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete G4<. Seems the old page was significantly different. Still voting to delete, base on non-notability. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to weak keep per addition of reliable sources and expansion. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 21:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. No sources. Wikieditor06 (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as I have just added several references to reliable third-party sources, reorganized the article, and significantly expanded the article. There's more work to do but the subject is both notable and verifiable and this article should be kept. (I would ask that any editor who has already weighed in take another look at the article in its present state.) - Dravecky (talk) 21:16, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.