Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Century Babies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 05:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Century Babies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Not notable. Fails WP:V and WP:NOT#IINFO, as all unsourced and opinionated fancruft about a term that can be succinctly explained at the relevant characters' articles.

Thebladesofchaos (talk) 02:21, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence that the topic meets the general notability guideline and it can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work. All content is original research by synthesis at best and the article has no verifiability due to the complete lack of references. A quick search engine test does not show evidence of reliable secondary sources to presume that the topic is notable. Jfgslo (talk) 18:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Much to my surprise, I actually found one reference that might conceivably contribute to notability for this topic. But that's still just one. —chaos5023 (talk) 04:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.