Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centro Bankstown
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. -- King of Hearts talk 03:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Centro Bankstown[edit]
Just a shopping center in a suburb of Sydney. It doesn't seem notable to me... Where (talk) 03:29, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's a major regional shopping centre, as noted in the article. And Wikipedia has numerous shopping centres already anyway. enochlau (talk) 04:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If we delete this, why don't we delete most of, say, Category:Shopping centres in the United Kingdom, including such heavy-weights as Monument Mall Shopping Centre and Broadmarsh Shopping Centre? enochlau (talk) 06:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable shopping center. JoshuaZ 05:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable mall in Sydney. We have quite a number of suburban malls articles already such as Compass Point Shopping Centre. --Terence Ong 10:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I remember seeing a nice black and white picture of the mall in a history book in the local library's reference section. It think it'll be worthwhile digging that up. I wonder if the copyright of the picture has expired. A question about copyright though - is it okay to copy an image that has expired its copyright from a book that is still copyrighted? -- Newhoggy | Talk 13:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrew nom It is impracticle and cruel to delete this shopping center article, when there are so many others. I'll have to look more carefully in the future...sorry! Where (talk) 13:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment No it isn't. One way consensuses can be formed is by looking at test cases. JoshuaZ 16:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the ramifications of deleting this article will be wider than just this article, I hardly think that an AfD is a suitable place to discuss it. enochlau (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- We do need some central discussion. We seem to decide these matters, by who happens to show up for each AFD, which is not good, as we've been very inconsistent. A middle-ground guideline (or extension of an existing guideline) is what's needed. The last thing we need, is an endless stream of "no consensus" mall AFDs, which don't build consensus. --Rob 03:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the ramifications of deleting this article will be wider than just this article, I hardly think that an AfD is a suitable place to discuss it. enochlau (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment No it isn't. One way consensuses can be formed is by looking at test cases. JoshuaZ 16:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep unless/until there is a policy of deleting all shopping centres. This is one of the largest shopping centres in Sydney so unless all other shopping centre pages get deleted, I don't see why this one should be. --Sumple (Talk) 04:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Perfectly good article. Ambi 01:56, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.