Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for European Reform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Centre for European Reform[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. Although some famous people gave their blessing to this association, it has not caused any mayor impact. The page appears that it was already deleted before. I don't know how much worse this version can be. Denidi (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. This one surprised me. Google and Google News searches for ("centre for european reform") turned up lots of references to the organization, including lots of pieces, and citations to pieces, written by fellows of the organization. However, all of my Googling, including attempts to refine the search by adding search terms like "organized" (and "organised"), "founded", and "established", turned up no real in-depth coverage by independent sources. The frequency with which the organization and its members are cited in the news argues in favor of keeping the article, but I can't find enough coverage to satsify WP:GNG. Even a single reasonably detailed piece in an independent source would change my !vote on this, and it really seems as though someone with more Google prowess than I could find one. — Ammodramus (talk) 03:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now in any case until better improvement is made. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.