Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Stadium (Leipzig, GDR)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Zentralstadion (1956). Randykitty (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Central Stadium (Leipzig, GDR)[edit]

Central Stadium (Leipzig, GDR) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested CSD, but this stadium is clearly identical with Red Bull Arena (Leipzig). The Banner talk 14:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • KeepMerge to Zentralstadion (1956). The two stadiums are distinct in the same way as Wembley Stadium and its predecessor Wembley Stadium (1923); the additional content created at this page should be added to the old stadium article. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Zentralstadion (1956) already exists; the creator of this new article initially improved that, then decided instead to make a new article and redirect that one there (I've undone the redirect). This article is claiming the precursor stadium never closed. It's a POV fork. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep
  1. It fulfills all interests, due the mass events there.
  2. It is world- known.
  3. It has an other size and design than the stadium today. The stands can not be entered.
  4. The article size would be too big emerged into the Red Bull (Arena), after the Wikipedia guidelines.
  5. The Red Bull Arena is an other stadium for itself and is closed to the old stadium wall.
  6. The article has been patrolled, by administrators.
  7. Before the article here, it was excluded from the Red Bull Arena Leipzig, due the architecture and form with shapes.
  8. The two stadiums are distinct in the same way as Wembley Stadium and its predecessor Wembley Stadium (1923).
  9. We'll cross that bridge when we come to it. The Red Bull, Arena has it's own soul and era and also the Central Stadium. Both articles are unfinished.
  10. Those two stadiums are distinguish extreme from each other.
  11. Two different political systems the two stadiums have.
  12. Both stadiums are linked to each other.
  13. It fulfills the guideline: Wikipedia:Splitting
  14. Wikipedia is browser orientated and readers wants to have the overview with short loading times.
  15. Wikipedia is not a book.
  16. All sources are existing.
  17. You can redirect the article from the begin until the renovation/closing. For example: Central Stadium, Leipzig (1956-2000)
Nukefirestadium (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Use an English name. --Nukefirestadium (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

+++That is the English Wikipedia and the article name should be in English and not in German. The year 1956 alone is wrong and nonsense. --Nukefirestadium (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC) ++++Central Stadium (German: Zentralstadion, German pronunciation: [tsɛnˈtra:lˈʃta:di̯ɔn])--Nukefirestadium (talk) 16:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here They all have the name Central Stadium.--Nukefirestadium (talk) 16:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.