Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central New York Maple Festival

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Marathon, New York#Central New York Maple Festival. Notable content already merged. (non-admin closure) Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 00:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Central New York Maple Festival[edit]

Central New York Maple Festival (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacked secondary sources since creation in April 2011. I can't find any in-depth coverage in RS. Fails WP:GNG. Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 20:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 21:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the article's two sentences into Marathon, New York. There is no "significant coverage" of the festival, as would be required for it to have its own article, but there is limited coverage in e.g. an article in the Cortland Standard and one on WXHC, which seems like it might be enough for a sentence or two in the article on the town. (The only mentions of it in books that I see are a single-paragraph mention in Virginia Schomp, New York (2005, ISBN 0761417389), page 88, a resolution here, and a sentence in this report.) -sche (talk) 22:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and copied the content into the article on the town, which already mentioned the festival in its lead (but not its body; thus, my edit brought it into compliance with MOS:LEAD). At this point, the article on the festival can be deleted/redirected to the town, IMO. -sche (talk) 10:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:58, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 23:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.