Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central (Call Center) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Central (Call Center)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2009. Can't really find anything on this, although the common title and the fact that I only speak English may be limiting my ability to find things. An old revision gives some more detail, suggesting that none of the actors are notable and that the film was shot on a camcorder. The arwikipedia article is slightly more fleshed out, but not by much, and the sources there don't really look like the add up to enough to get past the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM bars. Also doubting the reliability of at least one of the arwikipedia sources. I'm not seeing notability here, although editors who can speak Arabic might be able to turn up something. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The fact that an unsourced article like this has survived for 13 years is a blight upon Wikipedia's record. The fact that I have found even older unsourced articles is even more disconcerting.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Errr... Why are we talking about this? The whole "article" is one sentence. It is unsourced. How did this manage to stay here for 13 years...? The original version wasn't much better either, as it contained the short plot summary, the production companies and the people behind it. Then those parts of the article were deleted for some reason and so we are here, stuck with one sentence. Do we really need to talk about this? Should've been speedied, and if it's notable, it can be recreated. Most of the article creator's edits revolved around this, (his other edits are really minor) so COI is involved as well. The bland title also makes searching difficult (and btw, what kind of title is "Central (Call Center)" for a film? That must be the most bland, most uninteresting and also the strangest title for a film I've ever heard (I mean, why is "Call Center" in brackets?) but that's not the point here, just an opinion), and I can't read Arabic. I checked the sources on arwiki using Google translate. (Yeah, I know it sucks, but at least I have a grip on what the Arab sources talk about). They don't look too reliable. Still not convinced of notability. The article was taken for Afd back in 2011, and it was kept because sources were presented, although those sources are not even available by now, and one of them is just a literal Google search. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 12:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.