Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centipede (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. and I don't see one forthcoming with the language issues. No objection to a relist at a time where more input might be garnered. Star Mississippi 14:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Centipede (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, appears to fail requirements in WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since August 2021 DonaldD23 talk to me 23:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: - did you relist this because you feel the conversation has legs? Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my preference is to see at least 2 or 3 editors participating in a deletion discussion before deciding whether or not to delete a page. Of course, it's not mandatory but a simple relist brought out two more editors, you and Elmidae so I think it was worth doing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Can't say I'm getting much joy out of these links. The film set two separate sales/ticketing records, but that's not actually part of WP:NFILM criteria. What's missing here is critical reviews, which I'm not capable of finding in Persian. In absence of these, tend delete. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No soft delete since this has been PRODded. Language no doubt an issue but let's see if we can get as many sources as legs. Nice pun Lugnuts!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable for box office takings and reviews listed here which need assessing by Persian editors imv Atlantic306 (talk) 07:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.