Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Mathematical Sciences, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Mathematical Sciences, Huazhong University of Science and Technology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The refs are to the site, to a personal page and what looks a newsletter of the university, so neither independent nor reliable. It’s not even mentioned at Huazhong University of Science and Technology which you would expect if it were a notable (prestigious, award winning, etc. ) part of the university. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 02:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing to denote notability. There's an employment listing on Books, nothing on the other search engines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing specifically for these (instead for the university itself) aside from some of the same links listed here. Pinging DGG and David Eppstein for comment even though this is an obvious delete. SwisterTwister talk
Delete. Not yet notable. Our practice for separate articles for these institutes is especially restrictive. The reason there is no evidence for prestige is that it was just founded in May 2015. DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Universities are generally notable but department and center level subunits of them generally are not, unless they have been the subject of an unusual amount of attention from independent sources. This does not seem to be an exception to that heuristic. BTW, SwisterTwister: thanks for the pings, but I regularly check the academics/educators and mathematics deletion sorting lists so as long as an AfD is included in those lists there's no need to ping me to make sure I see it. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.