Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of the iTunes Store

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship of the iTunes Store[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough as an independent article. There is already enough coverd in the article about the iTunes Store itself. --Proud User (talk) 02:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge into the countries listed as doing the censoring. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 12:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Based on a quick look at Censorship of YouTube upon which this article was based, there is tremendous potential for quality improvement of an educational and encyclopedic nature on this topic. — Cirt (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree, I can think of very many reasons why one might need to look directly for this kind of information whether you be a publisher, artist, student, or even an avid fan. I also think that their is no better place to put this other than here as such information might exist but would not exist together in one repository. Andrdema (talk) 07:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Likely Keep as this seems acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 06:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Cirt makes a very compelling argument. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cirt. --Rubbish computer 17:06, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.