Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celtictalk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. per WP:SNOW J.delanoygabsadds 04:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Celtictalk[edit]
- Celtictalk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable, recently created forum. Article cites no references, with the single external link, being to the official site. Created by an editor with an apparent WP:COI, the forum currently fails all 3 criterion on WP:WEB. (Note - article immediately recreated following a speedy deletion by RHaworth [1]) --Flewis(talk) 09:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Run of the mill forum. Nothing that indicates notability. _ Mgm|(talk) 11:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. --DAJF (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. Slightly promo too. Dengero (talk) 13:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per DAJF. пﮟოьεԻ 57 16:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the article itself shows its not notable. abf /talk to me/ 19:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Govvy (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - cpmpletely non-notable. GiantSnowman 21:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable, also seems to be a self promo--ClubOranjeTalk 23:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball Delete - as nom, due to a solid consensus --Flewis(talk) 06:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.