Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrinerd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Celebrinerd[edit]
Article on Neologism used in one article in Time Magazine to describe Ken Jennings and apparently thereafter mentioned in Jennings' blog. Article notes an abundance of Google hits but the low unique count of 71[1] is more telling . Wikipedia is not a dictionary and WP:NEO is now guideline. At best this should be sent to Wiktionary. My original prod went uncontested and the article was recreated today.--Fuhghettaboutit 18:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. ... discospinster talk 18:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as I prodded for nomination's exact reasons and post-prod was turned into this AfD. ju66l3r 19:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. To closing admin--given that this is a recreation, if consensus is to delete, consider deleting and protecting.--Fuhghettaboutit 21:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. Andy Saunders 01:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.