Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecilie, Princess of Waldeck and Pyrmont

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anyone can create a redirect in the normal course of editing. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cecilie, Princess of Waldeck and Pyrmont[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Again, lots of genealogy and no indication of coverage in reliable sources beyond it, i.e. no apparent notability. The subject is a make-believe princess who has married and had children. She leads a private life and virtually nobody's heard of her. Surtsicna (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.Smeat75 (talk) 18:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 19:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing indicating she is discussed by anyone outside of what amounts to royalty yellow pages. JoelleJay (talk) 01:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to husband's article, unless/until it too is deleted. No independent notability, but worth a redirect (plus redirects from other names). PamD 10:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it is time to stop treating members of deposed families as default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_Consorts_of_nobility to her husband's article. Bearian (talk) 01:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.