Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecil Hills High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Courcelles (talk) 13:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cecil Hills High School[edit]

Cecil Hills High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsourced, fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are examples of "plenty of coverage "? My initial search only found routine coverage nothing in depth as required by WP:SIGCOV. LibStar (talk) 08:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete none of the sources I found on gnews were indepth to meet WP:SIGCOV. Just another school that fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 02:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Re "Plenty of coverage as with any other secondary school in the western world" - yes, of course, but it is almost always very local. It does not mean that this school meets out notability guidelines. It does not. --Bduke (talk) 08:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 23:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:JUSTAVOTE LibStar (talk) 23:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.