Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catriona Irving
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Catriona Irving[edit]
- Catriona Irving (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:MUSIC; CsD was contested at its talk page. H2H (talk) 06:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The artist has been "subject of multiple non-trivial published works". The myspace page displays images of media articles regarding the subject Myspace. --SilverOrion (talk) 06:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Every content is from MySpace itself; could you provide a third-party reliable content? H2H (talk) 06:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The content itself constitutes as a third party source, you can tell that it was obtained from a magazine and a newspaper. It was simply reproduced to be put on Myspace.--SilverOrion (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Every content is from MySpace itself; could you provide a third-party reliable content? H2H (talk) 06:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The artist has been "subject of multiple non-trivial published works". The myspace page displays images of media articles regarding the subject Myspace. --SilverOrion (talk) 06:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am confused why you removed the CSD tag. Just because it is contested does not mean that it can't be CSD'd. --mboverload@ 06:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And it is eligible for CSD since no notability has been shown at all. Look at the links. --mboverload@ 07:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment May barely meet WP:BAND according to some clippings from the MySpace page. I withhold my judgment for now. --mboverload@ 07:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability with reliable, third-party sources as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 01:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 05:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the coverage referenced ont he Myspace page appears to consist of a couple of very short reviews with no clear indication of where these reviews came from. A search on the web for references covering the subject turn up no reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The source is clearly stated on the review (eg. the Metro). Also the songs are avaliable on the iTunes music store.--SilverOrion (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.