Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Winder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 07:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Winder[edit]

Catherine Winder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG or any of the more specific notability guidelines. Of the two independent sources, one is routine "business executive leaves her job to 'pursue new opportunities'" coverage, the other is based on an interview about Clone Wars that covers Winder herself only in passing. Google News finds passing mentions about Winder's work on the Angry Birds movie by the dozen, but I haven't found a single additional instance of coverage that extended beyond half a sentence or a short quote. Huon (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete lacks any sources that could be used to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's nothing at all for WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE, nothing convincing of the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 04:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I started this article, though very early on in my Wikipedia life. The article already cites two independent reliable sources, and after a brief search I was able to find several others (including this, this, and this. I also found several articles about her (not just passing references) on Lexis Nexis that apparently aren't available online, including a 571-word story in The Province from May 2009; a 500-word Spanish language article from Mural, a Mexican publication, from August 2008; and a Playback story from 2010 along with a sidebar "3 things you may not know about Catherine Winder". (some of Playback's more recent stories including her are online, but not the older ones.) This was after just a quick cursory search; a more extensive search would probably turn up more. I think these sources satisfy WP:GNG, and the problem is simply that the article needs to be updated and expanded, but there is no deadline for such expansions and that's not a reason for deletion. — Hunter Kahn 20:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - her film work appears to have gotten some attention from reliable sources. The article needs a lot of beefing up - perhaps through userfication? Bearian (talk) 11:29, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 02:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It looks like there are more reliable sources out there that simply have not been farmed, but she appears to be notable enough. RockyMtChai (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.