Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Harrington (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone wishes material from the deleted article for merging with Peyton Place, please just ask Wifione ^Message 10:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Harrington[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources to WP:verify notability, as per the general notability guideline. Nomination three years ago ended in no consensus, due to some limited belief that such sources existed if only someone would find them. Based on three years with no improvement, and my own searches, I have concluded that a continued search WP:WONTWORK. There are no sources that can turn up more than a single sentence mention here or there (which are not enough to establish notability). Articles that cannot meet this minimum coverage cannot meet basic policy, and should be deleted. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This article meets Wikipedia guidelines. Sections are well referenced. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:38, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well referenced?! Which sections? If I removed all the unreferenced material, we'd be left with two sentences, the first of which is that she exists. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If there is any unique content put it in Peyton place. If. Greglocock (talk) 00:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not appear notable and lacks references. LogicalCreator (talk) 09:03, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge if anything valuable is there to Peyton Place. SarahStierch (talk) 05:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.