Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Ajike

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Ajike[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't meet the requirements of WP:BIO. A search for sources turned up no coverage in reliable sources and the references cited are press releases, self published sources and her personal website. SmartSE (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as multiple searches found no significant results aside from two press releases (republished). The article does not indicate any substantial notability and is self-promotional. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This smells like a hoax, right down to the supposed photograph with Ghaddafi. Everything out there is self-generated, and the only thing that looked half decent ended up being a press release repeated by four different sites. If it's not a hoax then it's a souped-up vanity bio; in any case it fails to meet WP:BIO. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 08:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only found two press releases and a website. No credible independent sources. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:HOAX. The clue (according to the linked article) is in her non-appearance in the film Kidulthood as claimed. Philg88 ^♦talk 21:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as blatant hoax. - Location (talk) 03:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax. —Jonny Nixon - (Talk) 06:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clear hoax. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Obvious hoax is obvious . –Davey2010^Talk 05:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.