Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catfish Hughes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete housekeeping closure: 10:04, 6 December 2014 Tokyogirl79 deleted page Catfish Hughes (G5: Creation by a banned or blocked user (Pearljambandaid) in violation of ban or block) czar ⨹ 03:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Catfish Hughes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small time local DJ lacking notability. Created by a banned editor returning with a bunch of socks. Sourced largely to a bunch of primary sources and dud links. Of the sources worth looking at:

"The Source". A passing mention from Brandon Robinson. And guess who wrote the Robinson page, the same sockfarm that wrote the Hughes page.

11, 12, 13. The same press release claiming he is "the official East Coast Voice of the Los Angeles Lakers." Or is the the official unofficial voice. Do Lakers know anything about it?

Nothing good here, is this a joke? Is this another alias for a rapper/publicist/producer that has repeatedly been deleted from Wikipedia? Catfish Hughes lacks coverage from credible sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.