Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caternow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted after I tagged it (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caternow[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP due to lack of WP:RS. All listed sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Contested PROD. shoy (reactions) 12:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 12:45, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete puffery - David Gerard (talk) 12:49, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable, looks like the company is trying to gain some notability by having a Wikipedia page. VViking_TalkEdits 14:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The company is a new company, how many other sources do you expect it to have? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikoroe (talk • contribs)
Delete (possibly CSD A7): A page on a new firm with no evidence or claim of notability. AllyD (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.