Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catarina Ferreira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). Withdrawn nomination. Quantpole (talk) 20:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catarina Ferreira[edit]

~~Minor tennis player who competes at a level that is not equivalent to fully professional. Therefore fails WP:ATHLETE~~ Quantpole (talk) 18:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nom withdrawn Quantpole (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see your point. She did play doubles match back in 2005 in the Estoril Tour event as a wildcard. You can check at her profile page at the wta website. Though that match (she lost) is her only real pro match. She also has five itf doubles tournaments if that counts. Secretaria (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

* Strong keep. Failure to follow WP:BEFORE should be considered a violation of WP:CIVIL and against WP:CONSENSUS. A discussion among the people who happen to come here is inadequate. -- Biaswarrior (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser confirmed sock. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What would be adequate in your opinion? Drawn Some (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE Biaswarrior was blocked as a sockpuppet. Drawn Some (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Though Catarina Ferreira may fail WP:ATHLETE, she passes WP:BIO. See this Google News Archive search. Cunard (talk) 20:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough. Lots of sources there (if you understand portugese!) I'll withdraw the nom. Quantpole (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.