Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalina Cruz (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Wizardman 23:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catalina Cruz[edit]

Catalina Cruz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not notable. I don't think she even has an article in IMDb. Epbr123 08:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose deletion - The article Catalina Cruz should not be deleted as she is a notable porn actress and thus merits an article. What may be deleted though is the parallel article Catalina cruz -- fdewaele, 23 March 2007, 11:30.
  • Speedy Delete and Salt the earth; this page was deleted as a result of an earlier AfD; someone later recreated it and Catalina cruz. both should be deleted, and salted. --Mhking 15:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep appears to have a significant following as an internet-based porn model/actress and fellatio instructor. (That's almost odd enough to be notable by itself.) She has also appeared in a significant number of fitness magazines under the alias JennaZ. Both of these potentially satisfy WP:BIO for the special case of entertainers. LaMenta3 22:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't think someone having their own porn website makes them notable unless its a notable website. Epbr123 23:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • That's not what I said. She doesn't have an IMDB article because all of her work has either been in print or on the internet. The print work establishes her notability as a fitness model, as the magazines she posed for are relatively notable in their genre. She has a strong web presence with three separate sites which are mostly independent of each other. Her main website has been in existence and regularly updated for 5 years -- a long time for any website, let alone a porn website. This suggests that she has a rather significant following through this site if it has been able to sustain for so long. She also has a website where she offers video lessons and other resources teaching fellatio techniques and a non-spam/splog, regularly updated blog which makes references to her main website, but operates mostly independently of it.LaMenta3 02:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, she is a notable porn and fitness model.Kamui99 03:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per LaMenta3. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. Artaxiad 21:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notability meets porn actress requirements. —Ocatecir Talk 06:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep famous porn actress. Deleting articles kills wikipedia. --91.127.108.155 20:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC) — 91.127.108.155 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Keep per Lamenta3 while removing the unsourced material which tends to creep into these and similar articles. Burntsauce 17:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Catalina_Cruz_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1071008034"